Web Rendering Techniques

Understanding SSG, SSR, ISR, and CSR

Modern web applications offer multiple rendering strategies, each with unique trade-offs. Choosing the right one can dramatically affect performance, SEO, scalability, and developer experience. Let’s break them down from a practical perspective.

Static Site Generation (SSG)

SSG pre-renders pages at build time, producing static HTML.
Pros:

• Extremely fast to serve and easy to cache via CDN.
• SEO-friendly out-of-the-box.
• Low server load — ideal for high-traffic static sites.

Cons:

• Build time increases with the number of pages.
• Updates require rebuilds unless paired with ISR.

Use cases:
Marketing sites, documentation, blogs with infrequent updates, landing pages.

---

Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

SSR generates HTML on each request.
Pros:

• Fresh content for every request.
• Full SEO benefits for dynamic content.
• Works well with user-specific or personalized content.

Cons:

• Slower initial response than static pages.
• Higher server load, requires robust infrastructure.
• Caching strategies (e.g., Edge Caching) are often needed to scale.

Use cases:
Dashboards, e-commerce product pages, authenticated content with dynamic data.

---

Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)

ISR is a hybrid approach: pages are statically generated, but can be updated in the background at a defined interval.
Pros:

• Combines the performance of SSG with near real-time freshness.
• Reduces rebuild time compared to full SSG.
• CDN caching still works efficiently.

Cons:

• Revalidation adds slight complexity in configuration.
• Not suitable for fully personalized content per request.

Use cases:
Blogs, product catalogs, news sites, marketing sites needing frequent updates without full rebuilds.

---

Client-Side Rendering (CSR)

CSR delegates HTML rendering to the browser using JavaScript.
Pros:

• Ideal for highly interactive UIs and SPAs.
• Immediate state updates without server round-trips.
• Minimal backend dependency for rendering.

Cons:

• SEO requires extra configuration (e.g., pre-rendering or hydration strategies).
• Slower initial load; FCP (First Contentful Paint) is delayed.
• Heavier reliance on client hardware and JS bundle size.

Use cases:
Internal dashboards, authenticated tools, SPAs where SEO is irrelevant.

---

Choosing the Right Strategy

When deciding between SSG, SSR, ISR, and CSR, consider:

1. Content Freshness: SSR or ISR for frequently updated content.
2. SEO Needs: Static or SSR/ISR preferred; CSR alone is not ideal.
3. Traffic & Scalability: SSG/ISR scales effortlessly; SSR requires more resources.
4. User Personalization: SSR or CSR if content varies per user.
5. Developer Experience: ISR offers the best of static + dynamic worlds for blogs and content-heavy apps.

Rule of Thumb:

• Use SSG where possible for speed and scalability.
• Apply ISR for content that updates regularly but still benefits from static delivery.
• Choose SSR for fully dynamic or personalized pages.
• Opt for CSR when building interactive SPAs where SEO is not a priority.

By understanding these trade-offs, developers can design web apps that are fast, SEO-friendly, scalable, and maintainable.